Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 290W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1770MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +392%
21.75 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4665
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +221%
14994
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
19
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +268%
70
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
40
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +212%
125
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
64
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +178%
178
Battlefield 5 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
33
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +157%
85
Battlefield 5 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
63
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +131%
146
Battlefield 5 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
82
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +129%
188
GTA 5 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
46
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +65%
76
GTA 5 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
46
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +147%
114
GTA 5 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
142
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +15%
164
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
48
1280
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
21.75 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
290W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GA104
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GA104-400-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy