NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and a Professional market GPU: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+234%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Xe Graphics
Desktop
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
8192
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
