Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA PG506 232

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1725MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +133%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
56
1280
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
165W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GA100
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy