NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA PG506 242

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1725MHz vs 1440MHz)

Lower TDP (100W vs 165W)

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 5 months late

More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

4.416 TFLOPS

PG506 242 +133%

10.32 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

PG506 242

Graphics Card

Nov 2019

Release Date

Apr 2021

GeForce 16

Generation

Tesla

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz

Base Clock

930 MHz

1725 MHz

Boost Clock

1440 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1215 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

24GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

HBM2

128bit

Memory Bus

3072bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

933.1GB/s

Render Config

20

SM Count

56

-

Compute Units

-

1280

Shading Units

3584

80

TMUs

224

32

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

224

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

192 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

24 MB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

138.2 GPixel/s

138.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

322.6 GTexel/s

8.832 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

10.32 TFLOPS

4.416 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.32 TFLOPS

138.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

5.161 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

GA100

TU116-250-KA-A1

GPU Variant

-

Turing

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

7 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

54.2 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

826 mm²

Board Design

100W

TDP

165W

300 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

No outputs

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

N/A

4.6

OpenGL

N/A

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

7.5

CUDA

8.0

6.6

Shader Model

N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

7

AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA PG506 242

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 5670 640SP Edition

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD FirePro W9100

Related News

1

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

2

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

3

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

4

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

5

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

6

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

7

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

8

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

9

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

10

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly