Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +7%
4.416 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285X
4.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.06 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.3 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.104 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Tonga
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy