Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2394MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900 XT +1065%
51.48 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4665
Radeon RX 7900 XT +476%
26911
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
596
Radeon RX 7900 XT +555%
3905
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
19
Radeon RX 7900 XT +436%
102
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
40
Radeon RX 7900 XT +412%
205
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
64
Radeon RX 7900 XT +367%
299
GTA 5 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
46
Radeon RX 7900 XT +269%
170
GTA 5 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
46
Radeon RX 7900 XT +269%
170
GTA 5 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
142
Radeon RX 7900 XT +33%
190
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1387 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2394 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
84
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
5376
80
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
459.6 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
804.4 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
103.0 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
51.48 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.609 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Navi 31
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT (215-145000156)
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy