Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA T400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1725MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +303%
4.416 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
6
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
TU117
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy