NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA TITAN Xp

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 12GB VRAM TITAN Xp to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1725MHz vs 1582MHz)

Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

NVIDIA TITAN Xp 's Advantages

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (547.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

4.416 TFLOPS

TITAN Xp +175%

12.15 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

4667

TITAN Xp +117%

10145

Blender

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

583

TITAN Xp +63%

954

OctaneBench

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

93

TITAN Xp +93%

180

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

TITAN Xp

Graphics Card

Nov 2019

Release Date

Apr 2017

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz

Base Clock

1405 MHz

1725 MHz

Boost Clock

1582 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1426 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

12GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5X

128bit

Memory Bus

384bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

547.6GB/s

Render Config

20

SM Count

30

-

Compute Units

-

1280

Shading Units

3840

80

TMUs

240

32

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

3 MB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

151.9 GPixel/s

138.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

379.7 GTexel/s

8.832 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

189.8 GFLOPS

4.416 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

12.15 TFLOPS

138.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

379.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

GP102

TU116-250-KA-A1

GPU Variant

GP102-450-A1

Turing

Architecture

Pascal

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

16 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

11.8 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

471 mm²

Board Design

100W

TDP

250W

300 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

6.1

6.6

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA T400

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 PCI

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107

Related News

1

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

2

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

3

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

4

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

5

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

6

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

7

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

8

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

9

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

10

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products