Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (2000MHz vs 1200MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M +66%
4.096 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +53%
581
Arc Pro A30M
378
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG2-128
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy