CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 670M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+205%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 670M
0.804 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
VS
GeForce GTX 670M
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2012
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
7
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
336
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.372 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.49 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
803.7 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.98 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF114
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N13E-GS1-LP-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 930A
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro W6150M
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7650M
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy