Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1250MHz vs 1200MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5300M +30%
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Navi 14
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XLM
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy