NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1485MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+713%
3.041 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280M
0.374 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-IV
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.360 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.44 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
374.5 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G92
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
