Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1485MHz vs 1219MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +143%
3.041 TFLOPS
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Lexa
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Lexa MCM Pro
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy