NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 6 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1485MHz vs 940MHz)

More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)

640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +321%

3.041 TFLOPS

Radeon R5 M255

0.721 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

VS

Radeon R5 M255

Graphics Card

Apr 2020

Release Date

Oct 2014

GeForce 16 Mobile

Generation

Gem System

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz

Base Clock

925 MHz

1485 MHz

Boost Clock

940 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1000 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

DDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

32.00GB/s

Render Config

16

SM Count

-

Compute Units

6

1024

Shading Units

384

64

TMUs

24

32

ROPs

8

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

256 KB

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

7.520 GPixel/s

95.04 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

22.56 GTexel/s

6.083 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

721.9 GFLOPS

3.041 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

721.9 GFLOPS

95.04 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

45.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

Topaz

N18P-G61

GPU Variant

Topaz PRO (216-0858030)

Turing

Architecture

GCN 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

1.55 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

125 mm²

Board Design

50W

TDP

Unknown

-

Suggested PSU

-

No outputs

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.2.170

7.5

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

2

AMD Radeon R5 M465 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

4

AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104

6

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance