Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 A360

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 A360

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1485MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +251%
3.041 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A360
0.864 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
1100 MHz
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.000 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.00 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
864.0 GFLOPS
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
864.0 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
54.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Meso
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Meso XT (216-0864018)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy