Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +77%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy