CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI FirePro V9800P
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI FirePro V9800P
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
ATI FirePro V9800P
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800P to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (90W vs 225W)
ATI FirePro V9800P 's Advantages
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+4%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800P
2.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
VS
FirePro V9800P
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
896
Shading Units
1600
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Cypress
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Board Design
90W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
3
AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
4
AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
5
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon R9 370
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy