Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 470 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 107.1GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +233%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 470 X2
0.855 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
837 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
107.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
11
896
Shading Units
352
56
TMUs
44
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.38 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.75 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
855.4 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
215W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GF100
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-030-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy