Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Nov 2004
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 6 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
300 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
19.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.900 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
NV41
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy