Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +2749%
2.849 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
1
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GF119
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy