Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 90W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Aug 2004
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
NV43
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
110 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy