Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 80W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV516
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy