Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FirePro 2260 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FirePro 2260 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2260 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2260 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +7022%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro 2260 PCI
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
40
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV620
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy