Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD FirePro D300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +30%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy