Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD FirePro W9000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +40%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy