CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 3750
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 3750
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
ATI Radeon HD 3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.18GB/s)
776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+1391%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3750
0.191 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
VS
Radeon HD 3750
Graphics Card
Jul 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
693 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.18GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
896
Shading Units
120
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.184 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.368 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
191.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV635
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV635 PRO (215-0682008)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon 660M
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA Tesla P4
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs Intel Arc A750
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon 680M
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA P104 100
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy