Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +2963%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Apr 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
896
Shading Units
32
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
47W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
G84
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G84-303-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy