Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +1680%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
896
Shading Units
64
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
G92
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy