Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +1149%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
12
896
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
143W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
G80
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy