Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +747%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
896
Shading Units
112
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
G92B
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G92-280-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy