Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs MTT S70

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs MTT S70

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 7GB VRAM MTT S70 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 220W)
MTT S70 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (7GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (392GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
MTT S70 +293%
11.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce 16
Generation
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
7GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
224bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
392GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
896
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
32
ROPs
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
1024 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.2 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
350 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
PCIe 8Pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
ChunXiao
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Turing
Architecture
MUSA
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
284 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.6
Shader Model

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy