Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +7205%
2.849 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GT218
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy