Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Apr 2004
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
NV41
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy