Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 435 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +383%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 435 OEM
0.589 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jun 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.360 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.40 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
588.8 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Oland
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy