Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FirePro V3700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +4351%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
40
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV620
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy