Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV560
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Turing
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy