Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +60%
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Cayman
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy