Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro W4000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +135%
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy