Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1665MHz vs 1590MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +4%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
896
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
TU116
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy