Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (2610MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +1377%
44.1 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
3590
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +575%
24253
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650
12
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +866%
116
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650
28
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +685%
220
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650
42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +609%
298
Battlefield 5 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650
21
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +528%
132
Battlefield 5 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650
46
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +334%
200
Battlefield 5 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650
63
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +217%
200
GTA 5 2160p
GeForce GTX 1650
28
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +442%
152
GTA 5 1440p
GeForce GTX 1650
30
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +480%
174
GTA 5 1080p
GeForce GTX 1650
100
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +90%
190
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
66
896
Shading Units
8448
56
TMUs
264
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
285W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
AD103
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
AD103-275-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy