Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2004
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
NV41
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy