Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon 550

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1665MHz vs 1183MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 56.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +146%
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon 550
1.211 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 16
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1100 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
56.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.86 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1211 GFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1211 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.71 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Lexa
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy