CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
AMD Radeon HD 6950
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 6950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+32%
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6950
2.253 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon HD 6950
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
22
896
Shading Units
1408
56
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.40 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.253 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
563.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cayman
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy