NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 5 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1785MHz vs 1468MHz)

More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

1024 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 's Advantages

Lower TDP (30W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +346%

5.027 TFLOPS

GeForce GT 1030

1.127 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +452%

5987

GeForce GT 1030

1083

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +2500%

26

GeForce GT 1030

1

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +642%

52

GeForce GT 1030

7

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +558%

79

GeForce GT 1030

12

Battlefield 5 2160p

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +4000%

41

GeForce GT 1030

1

Battlefield 5 1440p

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +358%

78

GeForce GT 1030

17

Battlefield 5 1080p

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +340%

97

GeForce GT 1030

22

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

VS

GeForce GT 1030

Graphics Card

Oct 2019

Release Date

May 2017

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz

Base Clock

1228 MHz

1785 MHz

Boost Clock

1468 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1502 MHz

Memory

6GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

192bit

Memory Bus

64bit

336.0GB/s

Bandwidth

48.06GB/s

Render Config

-

22

SM Count

3

1408

Shading Units

384

88

TMUs

24

48

ROPs

16

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

1536 KB

L2 Cache

512 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

23.49 GPixel/s

157.1 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

35.23 GTexel/s

10.05 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

17.62 GFLOPS

5.027 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1127 GFLOPS

157.1 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

35.23 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W

TDP

30W

300 W

Suggested PSU

200 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

GP108

TU116-300-A1

GPU Variant

GP108-300-A1

Turing

Architecture

Pascal

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

12 nm

Process Size

14 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

1.8 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

6.1

6.6

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro W7100

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs ATI All In Wonder HD 3650

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster