Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +2573%
5.027 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
9
1408
Shading Units
72
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

125W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GT215
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy