NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1785MHz vs 1770MHz)

Lower TDP (125W vs 290W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages

More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)

4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

5.027 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB +332%

21.75 TFLOPS

Blender

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

822

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB +387%

4010

OctaneBench

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

126

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB +215%

397

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

VS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

Graphics Card

Oct 2019

Release Date

Unknown

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz

Base Clock

1575 MHz

1785 MHz

Boost Clock

1770 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1188 MHz

Memory

6GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6X

192bit

Memory Bus

256bit

336.0GB/s

Bandwidth

608.3GB/s

Render Config

22

SM Count

48

-

Compute Units

-

1408

Shading Units

6144

88

TMUs

192

48

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

192

-

RT Cores

48

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1536 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

169.9 GPixel/s

157.1 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

339.8 GTexel/s

10.05 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

21.75 TFLOPS

5.027 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

21.75 TFLOPS

157.1 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

339.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

GA104

TU116-300-A1

GPU Variant

GA104-401-A1

Turing

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

12 nm

Process Size

8 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

17.4 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

392 mm²

Board Design

125W

TDP

290W

300 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.6

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon HD 6850

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon HD 8740 OEM

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD