CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce G103M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce G103M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
NVIDIA GeForce G103M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM GeForce G103M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+15673%
4.101 TFLOPS
GeForce G103M
0.026 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
VS
GeForce G103M
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Sep 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
8
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.560 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GE2-S
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
14W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 720A
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8550M
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M375X
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon E6465
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M270
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy