NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 3 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1335MHz vs 1150MHz)

More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +74%

4.101 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 965M

2.355 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +169%

4911

GeForce GTX 965M

1819

Blender

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +449%

731

GeForce GTX 965M

133

OctaneBench

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +240%

109

GeForce GTX 965M

32

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

VS

GeForce GTX 965M

Graphics Card

Apr 2019

Release Date

Jan 2016

GeForce 16 Mobile

Generation

GeForce 900M

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz

Base Clock

935 MHz

1335 MHz

Boost Clock

1150 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1253 MHz

Memory

6GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

192bit

Memory Bus

128bit

288.0GB/s

Bandwidth

80.19GB/s

Render Config

24

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

1536

Shading Units

1024

96

TMUs

64

48

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

1536 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.08 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

36.80 GPixel/s

128.2 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

73.60 GTexel/s

8.202 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

4.101 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.355 TFLOPS

128.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

73.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

GM206S

-

GPU Variant

N16E-GR-A1

Turing

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

2.94 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

228 mm²

Board Design

Unknown

TDP

Unknown

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

5.2

6.7

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 720A

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8550M

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce G103M

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7530M

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon 520 Mobile

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 840A

Related News

1

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

2

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

3

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

4

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

5

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

6

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

7

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

8

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

9

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

10

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower