Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1335MHz vs 1250MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M 's Advantages
Released 7 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +28%
4.101 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300M
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
1280
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
85W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PROA
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy