Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1700MHz vs 1335MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4.101 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5500M +16%
4.787 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
1408
96
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.6 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.574 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.787 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
85W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XTM
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy